LETTER: Election 2010

By Submission
Posted Jul 06, 2010 @ 01:29 PM
Print Comment

To the Editor:

I was mildly amused reading Chris Weeks’ letter to the editor in various newspapers over the last couple of weeks.   If I didn’t know any better, I would have thought I was reading a screen treatment for a sit-com for the fall schedule.  But the sad thing is, Mr. Weeks was serious.

Weeks wrote that he was “concerned” that Rep. Pete Schwartzkopf was “forgetting that he first had to win re-election.”  I can assure you that Pete has not forgotten that nor have those of us who serve on the 14th District Democratic Committee.  Pete doesn’t assume anything – he has worked hard each and every time he has run for re-election, even when he was unopposed, as he was in 2008.  Weeks is way off base in claiming that Pete takes the voters of the 14th District for granted.  Pete is doing what he’s supposed to be doing right now – representing the citizens of the 14th District in the General Assembly while it is in session.

Weeks cited a “recent poll” that supposedly showed 64% of respondents “would not like casino expansion.”  But he didn’t bother to explain who authorized the poll, where these “8000” respondents lived, or where this casino expansion was planned for.  For all we know, it could have been Maryland or Pennsylvania.  His failure to explain who paid for this poll is one example of Mr. Weeks’ and the Republicans’ propensity to play fast and loose with facts.  My guess is that this poll was paid for by the three existing casinos in the state, which oppose any expansion because it would mean competition.  Isn’t it ironic – a political party that prides itself for its support of free enterprise and capitalism has a candidate that opposes the very same things?

He also claims that he has been “consistent and clear” in his objections to casino expansion.  My question is to whom?  Has he ever spoken to Pete about this?  I doubt it.  Has he ever spoken to the principles behind Del Pointe?  Again, I doubt it.   I’ve never heard him talk about this and he only recently added something to his website about casino expansion.  Actually, Weeks’ stance parrots almost word-for-word what Eric Bodenweiser has been crusading about since Del Pointe was first proposed.  And since I saw Weeks and Bodenweiser together (almost attached at the hip) at the tea party “rally” in April where Bodenweiser was handing out his anti-Pete bumper stickers, perhaps Bodenweiser has been feeding Weeks talking points on Del Pointe.   Bodensweiser also denies having anything to do with the “whenpigsfly” organization, except that he has gone on local radio boasting that he is part of the group behind the effort.  Perhaps Weeks is also a part of this group, since he has yet to respond to media inquiries regarding it and has refused to denounce this anonymous group.  We should also note that Bodenweiser doesn’t live in the 14th District – perhaps he should pay more attention to what happens in his own district than ours.

To the Editor:

I was mildly amused reading Chris Weeks’ letter to the editor in various newspapers over the last couple of weeks.   If I didn’t know any better, I would have thought I was reading a screen treatment for a sit-com for the fall schedule.  But the sad thing is, Mr. Weeks was serious.

Weeks wrote that he was “concerned” that Rep. Pete Schwartzkopf was “forgetting that he first had to win re-election.”  I can assure you that Pete has not forgotten that nor have those of us who serve on the 14th District Democratic Committee.  Pete doesn’t assume anything – he has worked hard each and every time he has run for re-election, even when he was unopposed, as he was in 2008.  Weeks is way off base in claiming that Pete takes the voters of the 14th District for granted.  Pete is doing what he’s supposed to be doing right now – representing the citizens of the 14th District in the General Assembly while it is in session.

Weeks cited a “recent poll” that supposedly showed 64% of respondents “would not like casino expansion.”  But he didn’t bother to explain who authorized the poll, where these “8000” respondents lived, or where this casino expansion was planned for.  For all we know, it could have been Maryland or Pennsylvania.  His failure to explain who paid for this poll is one example of Mr. Weeks’ and the Republicans’ propensity to play fast and loose with facts.  My guess is that this poll was paid for by the three existing casinos in the state, which oppose any expansion because it would mean competition.  Isn’t it ironic – a political party that prides itself for its support of free enterprise and capitalism has a candidate that opposes the very same things?

He also claims that he has been “consistent and clear” in his objections to casino expansion.  My question is to whom?  Has he ever spoken to Pete about this?  I doubt it.  Has he ever spoken to the principles behind Del Pointe?  Again, I doubt it.   I’ve never heard him talk about this and he only recently added something to his website about casino expansion.  Actually, Weeks’ stance parrots almost word-for-word what Eric Bodenweiser has been crusading about since Del Pointe was first proposed.  And since I saw Weeks and Bodenweiser together (almost attached at the hip) at the tea party “rally” in April where Bodenweiser was handing out his anti-Pete bumper stickers, perhaps Bodenweiser has been feeding Weeks talking points on Del Pointe.   Bodensweiser also denies having anything to do with the “whenpigsfly” organization, except that he has gone on local radio boasting that he is part of the group behind the effort.  Perhaps Weeks is also a part of this group, since he has yet to respond to media inquiries regarding it and has refused to denounce this anonymous group.  We should also note that Bodenweiser doesn’t live in the 14th District – perhaps he should pay more attention to what happens in his own district than ours.

Weeks also fails in his arguments regarding casino licenses and where the revenue generated would go.  The state licenses casinos, plain and simple.  One of the things Weeks fails to realize is that part of the procedure when applying for a casino license are the limitations on where a casino can be built and how much it must turn over to the General Fund.  This is not racketeering, Chris.  This is what the law provides for.  By Weeks’ reasoning, any business that is granted a license by the state or a local government and then has to pay taxes or fees to operate is the victim of a shakedown.   I guess Weeks has been listening to the GOP talking points regarding BP too much.

It’s actually very good public policy to restrict where certain industries can operate.  That’s called zoning on the local level.  And I’m curious why Weeks believes that revenue generated by Del Pointe would be “disproportionately spent in New Castle County.”  What concerns me is that we have a candidate for public office who doesn’t even understand the basic method of how state government is funded.  In a nutshell, taxes, fees, and casino revenue, are some of the things that make up the General Fund.  The money comes from all over the state.  This is not a “redistribution of wealth” as Weeks claims.  If we followed his logic, then any money generated by the other casinos in the state, much less taxes and fees, should not come down to Sussex County.  Weeks’ stance is actually bad public policy!

Finally, Weeks goes after the jobs that a new casino might bring to Sussex County.  He cited a 5000 job figure in his letter; however, the data on the Del Pointe website, as well as the report issued by The Sage Policy Group, show that the number of jobs would be in the thousands, not an airtight 5000.  I wonder if he’s actually read the report.  If not, here’s a link to it - http://delpointeresort.com/DelPointMarketStudy.pdf.  The report fully explains the methodology in arriving at the number of jobs Del Pointe might create for Sussex Countians and it lists actual jobs that would be created.  Weeks’ argument that Del Pointe would take tourist dollars and jobs out of the 14th District is a failed argument.  Does he realize that some 14th District residents might actually find work at Del Pointe?  He has nothing to back up his claims – but it does make for a good sound bite.  It just sounds like more tea party rhetoric, which is not what we need or want in an elected official.

Pete has worked hard for the people of the 14th and has been a leader in ensuring that our state has a balanced budget year after year after year.  He has worked to make hard choices to keep spending in check but also to ensure that basic services such as schools and police protection continue for his constituents.

Meyer J. Persow, Rehoboth Beach

Loading commenting interface...
Delaware Advertisers

Site Services
Contact Us
Place an Ad
Archives
Coupons
Market Place
Autos
Travidia
Classifieds
Shopping
Lifestyle
Family
Food
Health
Home and Garden
Lifestyle 55